Classical Rhetoric 101: The Five Canons of Rhetoric – Style

by Brett & Kate McKay on March 16, 2011 · 19 comments

in Blog

Welcome back to our series on Classical Rhetoric. Today we’re continuing our five-part segment on the Five Canons of Rhetoric. So far we’ve covered the canons of invention and arrangement. As a quick review, the canon of invention is about brainstorming ideas for your speech or writing, and arrangement is about organizing your speech or text to ensure maximum persuasion.

Today we’re discussing the canon of style. Let’s begin.

What Is Style?

When people write memos or give persuasive speeches, the focus is usually on what they’re going to write or say. While it’s important that you have something substantive to say, it’s also important how you present your ideas. The canon of style will help you present your ideas and arguments so people will want to listen to you.

A mentor of mine gave me a great object lesson on the importance of style when crafting a message. He placed two boxes on a table. One was small and sort of crushed and wrapped haphazardly with newspaper and duct tape. My name was scrawled with black Sharpie marker on the newspaper.

The other was a medium-sized box, wrapped with handsome looking wrapping paper and topped with a giant green bow. A present tag hung from the bow and had my name written on it in beautifully done calligraphy.

“Pick which present you’d like.”

I picked the nicely wrapped present partly because I had an idea of what he was trying to teach me and wanted to play along, and partly because I just liked how it looked.

I slowly unwrapped the present, being careful not to rip the paper. I took off the top of the box and found a bunch of red tissue paper. I rummaged through the paper until I found a silver ballpoint Fisher pen.

He asked me to open the other box. I tore off the newspaper and lifted the top of the box to reveal the exact same present: a silver ballpoint Fisher pen.

The lesson was obvious. It doesn’t matter how great your message is, if you don’t wrap it up with style, people will probably ignore it in favor of a message that’s packaged nicely.

The Five Virtues of Style

The five virtues of style were first developed by two pupils of Aristotle: Theophrastus and Demetrius. The ancient Roman rhetoricians Cicero and Quintilian taught the virtues to their students and added their own spin.

1. Correctness. Correctness means speaking or writing in accordance with the rules and norms of one’s language. An effective communicator uses words correctly and follows the rules of grammar and syntax. Why? First, correct usage ensures clear and precise communication.

And second (and perhaps more importantly), correctly using language establishes credibility (or ethos, remember that persuasive tool?) with an audience because it indicates the speaker or writer is well-educated, understands the nuances of language, and pays attention to details. When someone catches language mistakes in a speech or piece of text, the thought often arises, “If the author can’t even follow the basic rules of grammar or even take the time and effort to review them, why should I trust what he has to say?”

When you’re attempting to persuade others, try to avoid anything that would distract your audience from your argument. Don’t give them a reason to discredit you by being lazy with correct grammar and usage.

Note: I know full well that many of AoM’s articles contain grammatical mistakes (perhaps even this one does!), and that this section offers the perfect opportunity to snarkily comment on this seeming irony. In truth, Kate and I read every single article several times before publishing, sometimes even out loud. But it is nearly impossible to catch every mistake; the brain has been proven to see things that should be there, but are not. While we lack a professional editor, we do our very best. And that is what you should strive for with your rhetoric–not perfection, but your very best effort. And as a listener or reader, is it always wise to give the rhetorician a bit of the benefit of the doubt before completely writing them off.

2. Clarity. It’s hard to be persuasive when people can’t even understand what you’re trying to say. Clear and simple writing ensures that your message never gets lost between you and your audience.

Unfortunately, many people think to be persuasive they need to “look smart” by using big words and complex sentence structures. The reality is that the simpler you write, the more intelligent you seem to others. A study done at Princeton University manipulated the complexity of the vocabulary and writing style of documents and gave them to students. Over and over again, the simpler versions were rated as coming from a more intelligent writer than the more complex drafts.

Smart writing is simple writing.

Clear and simple writing is actually quite difficult to do. It requires you to think hard about your topic, get at its core, and then put that core in terms that your audience can understand. Here are a few tips on writing and speaking with greater clarity:

  • Write or speak so an 8th grader can understand. If an 8th grader can understand your speech or article, then chances are an adult of average education can too. Practice this by taking complex legal/ethical issues or scientific theories and writing a short blurb that could be put in an 8th grade textbook. If you get stumped with pen and paper in hand, grab an 8th grader and talk the issue through with them face to face. It’s amazing what keeping this rule in mind can do to  help make you a clearer communicator.
  • Use strong verbs. Avoid is, are, was, were, be, being, been. So instead of saying “Diane was killed by Jim,” say, “Jim killed Diane.” Shorter, clearer, and punchier. Whenever I edit my writing, I always do a ctrl+f for those verbs and see if I can replace them with stronger verbs. Although sometimes you can’t do so without the sentence sounding worse than before.
  • Keep average sentence length to about 20 words. Sentence length is one of the biggest factors in determining how easy it is to understand what you’re saying or writing. Ideas can get lost in super long sentences. While you should avoid really long sentences as much as possible, you don’t want all your sentences to be just five words each either. That makes your writing and speaking sound choppy and rushed. Shoot for an average of about 20 words a sentence. And mix sentences of varying lengths together.
  • Keep paragraphs short. Ideally, each paragraph should contain just one idea. This ensures that your reader doesn’t get lost in a jumble of different points. When you write long paragraphs, it’s easy for more than one idea to sneak in. Avoid this by keeping paragraphs short. Shoot for an average of five to six sentences a paragraph.
  • Don’t use a five dollar word when a fifty cent word would work just as well. If you have a choice between a fancy word and a plain word, go with the plain word.

There are dozens more tips on making your writing or speeches clearer, but we have to move on.  For more advice on writing with clarity, pick up a copy of the bible on clear and effective writing: Strunk and White Elements of Style. Another book I found insanely helpful is Legal Writing in Plain English. It’s geared towards lawyers, but the principles apply to writing and speaking in any field.

3. Evidence. We’re not using “evidence” in the sense of facts you provide to prove a logical argument. For classical rhetoricians, the quality of evidence was a way to measure how well language reached the emotions of an audience through vivid description. Remember that most people are persuaded more by emotion (pathos) than by logic (logos). One of the best ways to elicit an emotional response from people is to appeal to their physical senses by using vivid descriptions.

For example, let’s say you’re making the case to your state legislator that your state needs to devote more funds towards fighting childhood hunger. Instead of starting your speech or letter by spouting off a bunch of dry facts, it would be more persuasive to tell a story of a specific child who’s a victim of hunger. In your story, describe the conditions this child is living in–the smells, the sights, the sounds. Describe the pangs of hunger that gnaw on his stomach every night while he lies crying softly, curled in ball on a urine-soaked mattress.

Who wouldn’t want to help this kid? That’s the quality of evidence in action.

4. Propriety. Propriety is the quality of style concerned with selecting words that fit with the subject matter of your speech and ensuring they’re appropriate for your audience and for the occasion. Simply put, propriety means saying the right thing, at the right place, at the right time.

A common rhetorical event where you see the quality of propriety flagrantly violated is the best man speech at a wedding. I can’t count how many of these speeches I’ve witnessed where the best man says something that makes everyone in the room cringe. You’d think it’d be common sense, but a wedding toast in front of a groom’s new wife and her family isn’t an appropriate place to talk about the groom’s past relationships or a night of drunken debauchery you had with him back in your college days. You might think it’s funny, but a wedding reception isn’t the place for that sort of humor. It’d be fine at a roast, but not a toast.

5. Ornateness. Ornateness involves making your speech or text interesting to listen to or read by using figures of speech and manipulating the sound and rhythm of words. Classical rhetoricians focused on incorporating different figures of speech to decorate their speeches. Here are a few that I particularly enjoy using:

  • Alliteration. Repetition of the same letter or sound within nearby words. Most often, repeated initial consonants.
    • Example: “Somewhere at this very moment a child is being born in America. Let it be our cause to give that child a happy home, a healthy family, and a hopeful future.” — Bill Clinton, 1992 Democratic National Convention Acceptance Address
  • Onomatopoeia. Use of words which sound like the thing they describe.
    • Example: Batman action words. Bang! Pow! Buzz! Zip!
  • Antanaclasis. Repetition of a word in two different senses.
    • Example: “If we don’t hang together, we’ll hang separately.” —Benjamin Franklin
  • Asyndeton. The omission of conjunctions between clauses, often resulting in a hurried rhythm or vehement effect.
    • Example: “I came; I saw; I conquered.”
  • Simile. An explicit comparison, often (but not necessarily) employing “like” or “as.”
    • Example: “The full green hills are round and soft as breasts.” –The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck.
  • Metaphor. A comparison made by equating one thing with another, showing that two unlike things have something in common.
    • Example: “A mighty fortress is our God.”

For an extensive list of figures of speech, check out Silva Rhetoricae.

Any other advice on improving your rhetorical style? What are some resources that you’ve come across that have helped your writing and speaking style? Share them with us in the comments!

Classical Rhetoric 101 Series 
An Introduction
A Brief History
The Three Means of Persuasion
The Five Canons of Rhetoric – Invention
The Five Canons of Rhetoric – Arrangement
The Five Canons of Rhetoric – Style
The Five Canons of Rhetoric – Memory
The Five Canons of Rhetoric – Delivery
Logical Fallacies
Bonus! 35 Greatest Speeches in History 

{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Beardy Pantaloons March 16, 2011 at 2:53 pm

In addition to “Elements of Style”, some great book on writing to make yourself understood and interesting are:

Zinsser’s “On Writing Well”.

“100 Words Almost Everone Confuses and Misuses”, by American Heritage Dictionaries.

“Between You and I–a little book of bad English”, by Cochrane.

“Poet’s Dictionary”, by Packard.

Those are a few I can bring to memory at the moment; I’m on the opposite side of the planet from my library right now.

2 Beardy Pantaloons March 16, 2011 at 2:57 pm

Nothing like making a typo in the title of a book. :/ *smacks forehead*

Everyone. The word was Everyone. :P

3 andyinsdca March 16, 2011 at 3:41 pm

Add to you list of weak verbs: “have” as a “helping” verb (whatever that means), as in “I have to be at work in 20 minutes.” (that’s an easy example of it).

4 HunterShoptaw March 16, 2011 at 3:48 pm

Very good post! I enjoyed the entire piece, though I must say your humor was quite entertaining. I agree that communication is an art form that must be learned and understood, and quite enjoy that AoM is taking this on. I also agree with the idea that you should use smaller words that portray the same meaning as larger words in most instances. Granted there are some times when a larger word should be used, if only to differentiate the meaning behind two things, but for the most part smaller words make people feel more at ease and a person at ease is likely to consider what you have to say better.

By the way, I am of the mind that a person’s written grammar should only be addressed if it is an on going problem. Sadly, all of us can not for correct, or even complete, sentences, and in truth this should be addressed, tactfully, for no other reason than that individuals personal betterment. It seems to me that people who harp on someones grammar for no better reason that to be better than that person are misguided in their pursuits. Direction should always be given tactfully and for the benefit of another.

5 Steve R March 16, 2011 at 11:57 pm

Thanks for another great post. I teach English as a second language for academics, writing is probably one of the most difficult skills my students face. The differences between spoken and written English can be very confusing for non-native speakers. Dictionaries cause some of the biggest problems like giving them a “fifty dollar” word when the “fifty cent” word would have been better! My mantra is “simplify simplify”!

6 Chris Gillis March 17, 2011 at 1:05 am

Just wanted to let you know that I love this series! Keep it coming mate. I’ll be using this as a springboard for further study. Eloquence is a lost art that I fully intend to rediscover.

7 Som March 18, 2011 at 1:16 am

I think coming off honest and genuine is pretty important in rhetoric (unless you’re telling a sci-fi story), and I guess the best way to come off that way is to be as honest and genuine as possible.

Also I noticed that my favorite speakers often times do not seem too biased or rushed to judgment. They come off like they’ve carefully weighed and looked at arguments from both sides, and explain why they came to the conclusion or stance they did. They don’t have air of that “I’m right, you’re wrong” kind of attitude, but seem humble and believe the audience can draw proper conclusions on their own.

8 Som March 18, 2011 at 1:18 am

oh and I think good speakers are often very organized and focused too in their speeches

9 Chad Rushing March 18, 2011 at 1:35 am

“For classical rhetoricians, the quality of evidence was a way to measure how well language reached the emotions of an audience through vivid description. Remember that most people are persuaded more by emotion (pathos) than by logic (logos). One of the best ways to elicit an emotional response from people is to appeal to their physical senses by using vivid descriptions.”

The fact that more people are persuaded by emotional anecdotes (which are often embellished or outright fabricated) than by logical argumentation is terrible and should hardly be encouraged by conscientious speakers. It brings to mind an evil despot wooing the fawning masses or Helen Lovejoy crying out, “Think of the children!” In the grand scheme of things, it is far better to lose debates while being honestly forthright than to win them by playing upon others’ heartstrings. We should all reason together, not emotionally manipulate each other.

10 Andrew March 18, 2011 at 1:01 pm

From the article:

“For example, let’s say you’re making the case to your state legislator that your state needs to devote more funds towards fighting childhood hunger. Instead of starting your speech or letter by spouting off a bunch of dry facts, it would be more persuasive to tell a story of a specific child who’s a victim of hunger. In your story, describe the conditions this child is living in–the smells, the sights, the sounds. Describe the pangs of hunger that gnaw on his stomach every night while he lies crying softly, curled in ball on a urine-soaked mattress.”

The balance between logos and pathos is difficult. When I hear a politician, preacher, or celebrity resort to pathos, I am immediately suspicious and viscerally turned off. Nowadays via mass media this kind of rhetoric, especially visual imagery accompanied by intense language devoid of actual meaning, inundates us constantly, goading our mammalian emotions as with a cattle prod.

I find an appeal to my ethical sensibilities first, basic logic second, and carefully restrained pathos last to be more persuasive.

11 Joseph Kraft March 18, 2011 at 5:14 pm

@Chad Rushing,
If you neglect the pathos in favor of the logos then you will lose the argument to the despot tugging at the heartstrings almost every time. I’m in favor of precise and correct logos but when an issue matters enough to attempt to persuade an audience; it also matters enough to take into account HOW they are likely to be persuaded.

12 Joseph Kraft March 18, 2011 at 5:20 pm

@Andrew
An appeal to you ethical sensibilities IS a pathos appeal. I agree that it is more sophisticated than appeals to base “mammalian emotions” but it is still a pathos appeal.

13 matthew March 18, 2011 at 8:42 pm

Great article! Don’t agree completely with the advice on pathos versus logos for “evidence” in an arguement or debate. Do find it interesting that logos has been used to encourage utilizing pathos in rhetoric to persuade others to a point of view. Keep up the good work!

14 P.M.Lawrence March 19, 2011 at 3:38 am

How, without being snarky, do I tell the blogger that he split an infinitive in the very passage where he admits he might be making grammatical mistakes even in this article? In truth, he really did it, and it did indeed break the flow for me, so I do think he needs to know about it – but the way he has set it up it’s almost bound to appear snarky despite my best efforts.

15 Bryan March 19, 2011 at 9:39 am

Sorry for my previous snark. It really is an excellent article.
I actually do have some real advice to add: Avoid jargon. It only hurts correctness, clarity, and propriety.
I work in information technology and I find that many of my colleagues don’t know how to talk to non-technically-minded folks. The biggest problem is that they use technical Jargon, acronyms and slang to explain things to people who don’t know the difference between VoIP and VPN, and who have no clue what is meant by the “bit bucket” or other IT slang.
Making sure that your use of jargon is appropriate to ALL members of your audience is essential. For instance, if you’re giving a presentation about a print marketing campaign to the marketing department head and the president of the company, don’t assume the president knows all of the printing terms you may be intimately familiar with.

16 alex March 19, 2011 at 10:18 am

i like the picture of henry clay used here

17 clenbuterol March 27, 2011 at 6:49 am

Great article, thanks for sharing. I-ve been reading the blog for half an hour and will be coming back. Thanks again.

C. Terol

18 William P March 30, 2011 at 3:51 am

For those of you interested in how all this applies to debates I suggest the following podcast from NPR: Intelligence Squared.

It’s fun to listen to those podcasts after reading these articles because they a) include arguments concerning sensitive subjects (racial profiling and usefulness of a two party system), and b) see who has paid attention to principles and to see which side changes more of the audiences votes.

Also Brett, thanks for helping me expand my book collection. My ideal personal library is starting to become more substantial.

-W.P.

19 kevin April 1, 2011 at 10:42 pm

the verbs you called ‘helping’ are ‘auxiliary’ verbs. I understand that clarity is always good, but to say “Use no auxiliary verbs” is quite clear.

Yes. I originally typed “Do not use auxiliary verbs.” Guarding my writing against such is now a priority.

Loving this series. Thank you.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

Site Meter