<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So You Want My Job: Nuclear Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Interests and Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: philTheEskimo</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-329862</link>
		<dc:creator>philTheEskimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-329862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the great article, and thanks to all for the reader comments. I need to vent (nyuk nyuk) a thought about this debate on future power. 
In the future we&#039;re going to need a lot of power. A lot a lot. Our culture is built on cheap energy and we&#039;re heading for trouble regardless. I think we&#039;re going to need all the power we can get our hands on. A single-solution response to a critical problem like power generation is to me obviously unwise. Instead of talking about nuke OR coal OR solar OR pyramid OR whatever we must start talking about nuke AND coal AND solar AND ... Any one-eyed solution on its own isn&#039;t going to be enough. Not nearly enough. Most posters here are thoughtful and sincere, but everyone in this needs to stop treating the debate like a sport with a winner and losers and start thinking about a resilient, heterogenous, collaborative set of energy solutions that includes every available power generation method. It&#039;s urgent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great article, and thanks to all for the reader comments. I need to vent (nyuk nyuk) a thought about this debate on future power.<br />
In the future we&#8217;re going to need a lot of power. A lot a lot. Our culture is built on cheap energy and we&#8217;re heading for trouble regardless. I think we&#8217;re going to need all the power we can get our hands on. A single-solution response to a critical problem like power generation is to me obviously unwise. Instead of talking about nuke OR coal OR solar OR pyramid OR whatever we must start talking about nuke AND coal AND solar AND &#8230; Any one-eyed solution on its own isn&#8217;t going to be enough. Not nearly enough. Most posters here are thoughtful and sincere, but everyone in this needs to stop treating the debate like a sport with a winner and losers and start thinking about a resilient, heterogenous, collaborative set of energy solutions that includes every available power generation method. It&#8217;s urgent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuke ET</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-99461</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuke ET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-99461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Article, lots of pros and cons for nuclear energy.  I&#039;m a Navy Nuke with ten years of experience and it sounds like the civilian side of the nuclear industry is very similar to the military program.  I wanted to work in the nuclear field when I get out but now I&#039;m starting to rethink that decision.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article, lots of pros and cons for nuclear energy.  I&#8217;m a Navy Nuke with ten years of experience and it sounds like the civilian side of the nuclear industry is very similar to the military program.  I wanted to work in the nuclear field when I get out but now I&#8217;m starting to rethink that decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-98203</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-98203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small world daniel. I too am going to Texas A&amp;M for nuclear engieering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small world daniel. I too am going to Texas A&amp;M for nuclear engieering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-97750</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-97750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned the cost side of nuclear plants to an ex-navy nuke guy and his buddy.  They thought this argument against nuclear engineering was very ironic, since over half the cost and the long delays are due to lawsuits and stalling by the likes of Greenpeace.  I have also been accepted into a nuclear engineering program at Texas A&amp;M.  
BTW I am a libertarian, I hated Bush b/c of how loose he was with money.  Obama is giving me a heart attack at 18.  
Personally I think if the government got out of the way with the overly burdensome/excessive regulation nuclear power would be one of the premier sources of energy in the country today.
Despite Obama&#039;s support for loans for the nuclear industry, I still can&#039;t believe he pulled the plug on the Nevada waste depository.  It makes you wonder about his true intentions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned the cost side of nuclear plants to an ex-navy nuke guy and his buddy.  They thought this argument against nuclear engineering was very ironic, since over half the cost and the long delays are due to lawsuits and stalling by the likes of Greenpeace.  I have also been accepted into a nuclear engineering program at Texas A&amp;M.<br />
BTW I am a libertarian, I hated Bush b/c of how loose he was with money.  Obama is giving me a heart attack at 18.<br />
Personally I think if the government got out of the way with the overly burdensome/excessive regulation nuclear power would be one of the premier sources of energy in the country today.<br />
Despite Obama&#8217;s support for loans for the nuclear industry, I still can&#8217;t believe he pulled the plug on the Nevada waste depository.  It makes you wonder about his true intentions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What About Now?</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-97024</link>
		<dc:creator>What About Now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-97024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TooExpensive:  

I am glad that you are driving the numbers and not just your liberal bias.  But those who replied to you were effectively able to draw out your true liberal bend.  Hence, I would like you to revisit your position now that Mr. Libertarian Obama has approved new construction on Nuclear Power Plants.  Can you still defend this position with the numbers with your daddy going that direction, or is he just placating Republican pressure and trying to create jobs the Republican way because none of his pre-election rhetoric panned out?  Is he showing that only Republican plans demonstrate PRACTICAL returns?   And while you are at it, please address the $700 BILLION debt to China that libertarians poured into the economy like water into sand that our children will have to pay back with no return...as in the return of energy production.  At least Nuclear Energy has a myriad of returns.  It is far more important that the USA stay at the forefront of all areas of nuclear development on a global stage.  The country that owns the most nuclear knowledge wins...not the country that gives away the most money to its citizens (or illegal guests) with zero show of return (i.e. willingness to WORK for their handouts.)  

I do agree that it is best to have an industry that can stand on its own and not be forever in the red.  And since you have identified the problem, what is your solution to the global energy crisis?  You apparently have one...and it IS science based, right?  The world is anxiously awaiting another libertarian savior to walk on water and solve our energy crisis...and YOU&#039;RE IT obviously.  Or is all your talk just more highlighting of Republican faults as seen through liberal eyes?  Don&#039;t we get enough of that kind of yellow journalism noise thru Michael Moore and Jon Stewart?  What is your PRACTICAL solution to the energy dilemma?  (I don’t expect a liberal to have a solution, just more finger pointing at Republicans.  But give it your best shot.)

Thanks.  I&#039;m going for the Nuke master&#039;s degree.  You helped solidify that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TooExpensive:  </p>
<p>I am glad that you are driving the numbers and not just your liberal bias.  But those who replied to you were effectively able to draw out your true liberal bend.  Hence, I would like you to revisit your position now that Mr. Libertarian Obama has approved new construction on Nuclear Power Plants.  Can you still defend this position with the numbers with your daddy going that direction, or is he just placating Republican pressure and trying to create jobs the Republican way because none of his pre-election rhetoric panned out?  Is he showing that only Republican plans demonstrate PRACTICAL returns?   And while you are at it, please address the $700 BILLION debt to China that libertarians poured into the economy like water into sand that our children will have to pay back with no return&#8230;as in the return of energy production.  At least Nuclear Energy has a myriad of returns.  It is far more important that the USA stay at the forefront of all areas of nuclear development on a global stage.  The country that owns the most nuclear knowledge wins&#8230;not the country that gives away the most money to its citizens (or illegal guests) with zero show of return (i.e. willingness to WORK for their handouts.)  </p>
<p>I do agree that it is best to have an industry that can stand on its own and not be forever in the red.  And since you have identified the problem, what is your solution to the global energy crisis?  You apparently have one&#8230;and it IS science based, right?  The world is anxiously awaiting another libertarian savior to walk on water and solve our energy crisis&#8230;and YOU&#8217;RE IT obviously.  Or is all your talk just more highlighting of Republican faults as seen through liberal eyes?  Don&#8217;t we get enough of that kind of yellow journalism noise thru Michael Moore and Jon Stewart?  What is your PRACTICAL solution to the energy dilemma?  (I don’t expect a liberal to have a solution, just more finger pointing at Republicans.  But give it your best shot.)</p>
<p>Thanks.  I&#8217;m going for the Nuke master&#8217;s degree.  You helped solidify that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooExpensive</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-91116</link>
		<dc:creator>TooExpensive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-91116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An another note, my purpose is not to instigate protests but disuade people from pursuing dead end careers in the nuclear industry. The jobs outlook is probably similar to that of people with computer science degrees during the dot com bubble. We couldn&#039;t push them out of college fast enough and now look at them. They&#039;re probably serving your coffee at Starbucks.

You&#039;re better off getting a construction management degree so you can be involved with the building of it (if that ever happens) and to have something to fall back on. Face it, there aren&#039;t many jobs to go around when it comes to operating a nuclear plant. What are the odds you will beat the next guy for the job when we have millions of people out of work (granted they may not be trained) and overseas talent who have actual experience designing/building/running a plant instead of you coming right out of school.

If it&#039;s your dream, by all means go for it. Just keep in mind that it&#039;s not a video game and the whole thing isn&#039;t rigged for a happy ending no matter what you choose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An another note, my purpose is not to instigate protests but disuade people from pursuing dead end careers in the nuclear industry. The jobs outlook is probably similar to that of people with computer science degrees during the dot com bubble. We couldn&#8217;t push them out of college fast enough and now look at them. They&#8217;re probably serving your coffee at Starbucks.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re better off getting a construction management degree so you can be involved with the building of it (if that ever happens) and to have something to fall back on. Face it, there aren&#8217;t many jobs to go around when it comes to operating a nuclear plant. What are the odds you will beat the next guy for the job when we have millions of people out of work (granted they may not be trained) and overseas talent who have actual experience designing/building/running a plant instead of you coming right out of school.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s your dream, by all means go for it. Just keep in mind that it&#8217;s not a video game and the whole thing isn&#8217;t rigged for a happy ending no matter what you choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooExpensive</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-91110</link>
		<dc:creator>TooExpensive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-91110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not against the things only nuclear power can accomplish. I don&#039;t see powering a carrier with solar or diesel as reasonable nor do I see going without a carrier as an option. Because nuclear powers our military and provides me with &quot;freedom&quot; doesn&#039;t mean I owe it to the industry to subsidize a new plant to supply power for the lights in my home. 

You might have read the articles I posted but based on your opinion that they are &quot;politically motivated&quot; it indicates you did not understand them. This is not a political issue it&#039;s a financial issue. Numbers. Math. Look at what is needed to get the ball rolling. The President has pledged almost $10 billion in loans to push nuclear forward even with a &gt;50% probability of default on those loans.

Although this does not have to be a political issue it unfortunately seems to always go that way. Here&#039;s my two cents:

A Libertarian deserves infinitely more respect than any Republican. While I might not agree with Libertarians (or any party) 100%, they are honest and consistent whereas Republicans stink of hypocrisy. They praise the free markets and despise &quot;big government&quot; but don&#039;t want to talk about the huge subsidies they provide to the coal and nuclear industries. If coal and nuclear are so great why can&#039;t they stand on their own feet? The only reason new technologies are not cost competitive with coal is because of strong lobbying on behalf of the coal industry. A coal operation is also a lot cheaper to run when the full costs of doing business are not recognized. If you&#039;re not sure what the full costs of running a coal operation are you can ask the poor folks who live and work at or near coal mines about their water quality. Republicans can&#039;t have it both ways. Either pick free markets or big government and stop whining. The GOP almost sound like an incompetent socialists. Instead of owning the corporations outright they insist on handing money to various industries/companies with no say in how they operate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not against the things only nuclear power can accomplish. I don&#8217;t see powering a carrier with solar or diesel as reasonable nor do I see going without a carrier as an option. Because nuclear powers our military and provides me with &#8220;freedom&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean I owe it to the industry to subsidize a new plant to supply power for the lights in my home. </p>
<p>You might have read the articles I posted but based on your opinion that they are &#8220;politically motivated&#8221; it indicates you did not understand them. This is not a political issue it&#8217;s a financial issue. Numbers. Math. Look at what is needed to get the ball rolling. The President has pledged almost $10 billion in loans to push nuclear forward even with a &gt;50% probability of default on those loans.</p>
<p>Although this does not have to be a political issue it unfortunately seems to always go that way. Here&#8217;s my two cents:</p>
<p>A Libertarian deserves infinitely more respect than any Republican. While I might not agree with Libertarians (or any party) 100%, they are honest and consistent whereas Republicans stink of hypocrisy. They praise the free markets and despise &#8220;big government&#8221; but don&#8217;t want to talk about the huge subsidies they provide to the coal and nuclear industries. If coal and nuclear are so great why can&#8217;t they stand on their own feet? The only reason new technologies are not cost competitive with coal is because of strong lobbying on behalf of the coal industry. A coal operation is also a lot cheaper to run when the full costs of doing business are not recognized. If you&#8217;re not sure what the full costs of running a coal operation are you can ask the poor folks who live and work at or near coal mines about their water quality. Republicans can&#8217;t have it both ways. Either pick free markets or big government and stop whining. The GOP almost sound like an incompetent socialists. Instead of owning the corporations outright they insist on handing money to various industries/companies with no say in how they operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-89919</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-89919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a pretty interesting article (along with the comment debate) I am a senior in high school and am thinking about nuclear engineering as a possible career choice. This is an awesome blog, best on the internet in my opinion, keep it up]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a pretty interesting article (along with the comment debate) I am a senior in high school and am thinking about nuclear engineering as a possible career choice. This is an awesome blog, best on the internet in my opinion, keep it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-74426</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-74426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great interview. All the questions I had did not go unanswered after reading this article. This is some very handy information here, anyone looking to apply in this field or just to find out what a nuclear engineer does, this is definitely the article to look at. I&#039;ve put a lot of effort into searching for other sites that might have half as much information as there was here, and when I found this article I was pleased to read it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview. All the questions I had did not go unanswered after reading this article. This is some very handy information here, anyone looking to apply in this field or just to find out what a nuclear engineer does, this is definitely the article to look at. I&#8217;ve put a lot of effort into searching for other sites that might have half as much information as there was here, and when I found this article I was pleased to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usamah akhtar</title>
		<link>http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/01/07/so-you-want-my-job-nuclear-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-24578</link>
		<dc:creator>usamah akhtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=1247#comment-24578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how much money do you get as a engineer on airoplanes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how much money do you get as a engineer on airoplanes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.294 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-19 11:03:38 -->

<!-- Compression = gzip -->